I'm just getting into the old social insurance
texts by Rubinow and Epstein.  The political
need to impose a market insurance straitjacket
on SS is brought out more clearly.  The trust
fund is the least of the problems.  In general,
this has been a fundamental problem in U.S.
public policy for centuries--implementing
social welfare policies under the weight
of laissez-faire ideology.

But I would say that although the bonds do not
reflect any specifically demarcated,
income-generating activity, they
do reflect the USG's tax capacity, backed by
the force of law and special bodies of armed
men, so I sez the bonds are too worth something.
Exactly what they claim to be worth, in fact.

Imagine a big corporation issuing bonds that are
paid out of some reserve within their otherwise
diverse and complex holdings.  The sub-account
is basically fungible.  The value of the bonds
depends on the firm's position as a whole.  This
would be true if the firm engaged in no production
per se, as well if its income derived from outright
criminal activity.

"Transfer" is reductionist terminology in re:
SS.  That somebody pays and somebody gets is trivial.
There is much else going on.
SS benefits are triggered by contingencies
and have insurance value ex ante that is not the
same as the nominal cash flying back and forth.

It is useful in some contexts to focus on the
transfer aspect, but it does a basic injustice
to the program, and to the tenable functions of
social-democracy or socialism in general.

mbs

-----Original Message-----
From: PEN-L list [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Henwood
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 5:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bush & SS

Daniel Davies wrote:

>Or in other words, Social Security is a transfer program, not a savings
>program, and it was an achingly stupid rhetorical move for the
>Democratic Party to start defending it as a savings program.

But they're trapped by the rhetoric that FDR used from the beginning
- in order to avoid tripping American suspicions about "welfare," it was
presented as "insurance." The truth of its being a transfer program had to
be hidden.

Doug

Reply via email to