|
Sabri, I tend to agree with you except the first clause "our planet is shrinking". I would argue, because of peak oil and global warming, globalism ("a shrinking planet") is shortly, if not already, in retreat. All of those writing in this area argue, I think correctly, that we must retreat into an era of localism. Indeed, many argue that the US is not a nation state and is too large to be a nation state and should be broken up into a series of regional governments. (Hopefully, this would end the US imperialist design). As a Canadian, I am sympthetic to that argument and, of course, to the argument that Canada should be broken into a series of regional governments. To an extent that may already be true. This leads me to this more or less motherhood generalization, that the only meaningful government in the future are the "local" governments covering local/regional socio-economic regions; and regional "confederations" of local governments meaning that confederal positions are based on regional consensus. "National" (whatever that means) interests must conflate the interests of the local/regional interests. Thus the nation state must, in essense, become a very local thing. But that means, of course, a very different conception of the 'Nation State'.
|
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.2/137 - Release Date: 10/16/05
