Right, but the ostensible reason was not ideology. Anderson's position was eliminated. No talk about ideology. I would be that Yale did not say that anarchism was a factor, although it could possibly have said that activities were.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:01:25AM -0500, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote: > On Jan 20, 2006, at 12:57 AM, Michael Perelman wrote: > > > Might it be more accurate to have said ostensibly fired for their > > political opinions. Just like no union organizers are ever fired > > for organizing? Employers can always find some justification. > > > > Lou was making the case that the US is not fascistic; he was > > correct, but the ideological barriers are pretty extreme. > > > There are some recent example: David Graeber, an anarchist > anthropologist at Yale, who didn't get his contract renewed; Adrienne > Anderson, a professor of environmental studies whose courses got > abolished by University of Colorado. > > > Yoshie Furuhashi > <http://montages.blogspot.com> > <http://monthlyreview.org> > <http://mrzine.org> -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
