CB: Hounding Communists and other radicals out of trade unions is an attack
on trade unions, weakening them if not destroying them. It is certainly a
class conscious attack on the working class by the ruling class, as are all
the other attacks on Communists in the McCarthyism. Attacks on Communists
are attacks on the working class.

Yes, the attacks on the CP'ers were attacks on the working class but it was
never the intention to *break* the unions. During the 1950s you had the
emergence of a social pact between the AFL-CIO bureaucracy which involved
support for US aggression abroad and a sizable slice of the pie at home.
You had an unprecedented rise in real wages as auto workers et al began to
move to the suburbs, buy second cars and send their kids to college.
Fascism is marked above all by the inability of the capitalist system to
satisfy the basic economic needs of the working class during a period of a
steep drop in profits. Workers go out on strike with an ever greater degree
of militancy until the ordinary  forces of repression (cops, army, etc.)
prove incapable of breaking them. That is when fascist bands come into
play. There was none of this happening in the 1950s.

Hitler is not the only fascist in history. South African fascists outlawed
Communists as the McCarthyite did. In other words, McCarthyism is comparable
to Apartheid fascism. Do you agree that Apartheid South Africa was fascist ?

No, I would characterize it in the same way that I would characterize
Israel, a racist state with authoritarian features.

The McCarthyite attacks on Communist and radical union leaders is comparable
the acts of various fascists.

Hitler made ultra-nationalist speeches. So did Teddy Roosevelt. But
Roosevelt was not a fascist.

Also, a major part of Nazism was illegal war. It didn't just consist in the
characteristics you describe above. Bush is carrying out an illegal war and
conquest, like the Nazis did.

You are committing a logical fallacy. Lions eat meat. So do I. I am not a lion.

Of course, the Democrats were complicit. Before McCarthy, the Truman
administration jailed the National Board of the Communist Party. That it was
bipartisan makes it even more like a one party state.

The key term is "like". I am like Lenin in that I write about the need for
socialist revolution, but I am not identical to Lenin.

If the things at UCLA are merely intramural competition between bourgeois
liberals and conservatives, just a "witchhunt" why should we worry about it,
unless it portends something more grave ? Like fascism ( which is not
identical with Nazism )?

We should worry about it, but we also have to respect the need for
scientific rigor. If you have a headache, brain surgery is not indicated.
If you have a rightwing graduate from UCLA setting up a website, armed
struggle is not indicated.


--

www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to