so who said it? (BTW, I don't think it's quite true. It ignores the complicating factor of the contradictions of capitalist accumulation.)
On 4/10/06, Perelman, Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, you are right. > > > "From one important point of view, indeed, the avoidance of > inflation and the maintenance of full employment can be most > usefully regarded as conflicting class interests of the bourgeoisie > and the proletariat, respectively, the conflict being resolvable only > by the test of relative political only by the test of > relative political power in the society and its resolution > involving no reference to an overriding concept of the social > welfare.". > > Michael Perelman > Economics Department > California State University > michael at ecst.csuchico.edu > Chico, CA 95929 > 530-898-5321 > fax 530-898-5901 > -- Jim Devine / "There can be no real individual freedom in the presence of economic insecurity." -- Chester Bowles
