Eubulides wrote: > > > In some circumstances ad hominem means intratheoretic > inconsistency[ies], or paradoxicalization as process. As KM seems to > be fond of sociologizing paradox :-) it may be the manner of his usage > in the context above. Large scale belief change on the path to > collectively coherent behavior/action a la chaos theory enthusiasts > language game.......... >
It could be in modern jargon, made sensible to lived experience. (I never have known, though, what people mean by lived experience. The opposite of a corpse's experience? C > E
