I don't think that the al-Qaeda business is a conspiracy; it's more of a network. Since the 1980s, jihadist networks have developed, first in response to the USSR in Afghanistan and then against the US (though it seemingly was allied at first with the US in Afghanistan and in the Balkans). I can't imagine that al-Qaeda wasn't connected in some way to the first bombing of the World Trade Center, the embassy bombings in East Africa, the U.S.S. Cole, etc. If al-Qaeda is connected with these actions, why is there a theory that says it's not connected with 911, a more successful replay (to them) of the first bombing of the WTC?
On 6/13/06, Paul Zarembka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which means we should not discuss Bush's conspiracy theory of Osama bin Laden and 19 hijackers. After all, this definitely qualifies as a conspiracy theory. And we all know how truthful the Bush administration people are. Paul Z.
-- Jim Devine / "Did you ever think that making a speech on economics is a lot like pissing down your leg? It seems hot to you, but it never does to anyone else." -- Lyndon B. Johnson.
