me:
> I wasn't seeing RPE as a "conspiracy theory journal," either. > > On that note, I must apologize to Paul Zarembka. Because of the top > title of "CONFRONTING 9-11," followed only underneath by "IDEOLOGIES > OF RACE, AND EMINENT ECONOMISTS" -- and because Paul said something to > me in person along the lines of "you won't like this issue," I didn't > read the full table of contents....
Paul Zarembka wrote:
Jim, Thanks, as I believe you are thinking your earlier comment: "my two articles published in _Research in Political Economy_ will be associated with "conspiracy theory"? Yuck."
actually, now that I think of it, I was apologizing for not taking the current volume of the RPE seriously because the first impression I got (partly from you) was that the _whole issue_ involved 9-11 conspiracy theory. The resulting assumption (since, after all, first impressions are very powerful) has one basis for _all of_ my discussions of it on pen-l. Am I now right to presume that it's only the editors' introduction and possibly the first article that get involved with CT? (I'll have to get a copy of RPE and do a CT scan of it...) -- Jim Devine / "In the Soviet Union, capitalism triumphed over communism. In this country, capitalism triumphed over democracy." -- Fran Lebowitz
