The current volume is almost all about 9-11 conspiracy theory. There were two recent volumes with 9-11 in the name.
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/708598/description#description http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/bookdescription.cws_home/660839/description#description > me: >> > I wasn't seeing RPE as a "conspiracy theory journal," either. >> > >> > On that note, I must apologize to Paul Zarembka. Because of the top >> > title of "CONFRONTING 9-11," followed only underneath by "IDEOLOGIES >> > OF RACE, AND EMINENT ECONOMISTS" -- and because Paul said something to >> > me in person along the lines of "you won't like this issue," I didn't >> > read the full table of contents.... > > Paul Zarembka wrote: >> Jim, Thanks, as I believe you are thinking your earlier comment: "my two >> articles published in _Research in Political Economy_ will be associated >> with "conspiracy theory"? Yuck." > > actually, now that I think of it, I was apologizing for not taking the > current volume of the RPE seriously because the first impression I got > (partly from you) was that the _whole issue_ involved 9-11 conspiracy > theory. The resulting assumption (since, after all, first impressions > are very powerful) has one basis for _all of_ my discussions of it on > pen-l. > > Am I now right to presume that it's only the editors' introduction and > possibly the first article that get involved with CT? > > (I'll have to get a copy of RPE and do a CT scan of it...) > -- > Jim Devine / "In the Soviet Union, capitalism triumphed over > communism. In this country, capitalism triumphed over democracy." -- > Fran Lebowitz >
