At around 15/7/06 1:59 pm, Doyle Saylor wrote:
> Grretings Economists,
> On Jul 15, 2006, at 10:24 AM, Shane Mage wrote:
>
>> Yes, and the existence of God is well supported by observation
>> of the pile of crutches at Lourdes.
>
> Doyle;
> One can be skeptical of anything. And that can be fruitful. However,
> a great deal of money is spent on astrophysics. Are you saying we can
> spend that on something else that would give us better understanding?
>
A question arises: better understanding of what? If we spent the
millions wasted on NASA in public health, we may get a better
understanding of health issues, or we may not, but it may still be money
better spent.
--ravi
--
Support something better than yourself: ;-)
PeTA: http://www.peta.org/
GreenPeace: http://www.greenpeace.org/
If you have nothing better to do: http://platosbeard.org/
