*       From: Leigh Meyers

I really really wish someone would write a one paragraph synopsis of what
fascism *is*, and post it, because I've read, and always understood is that
it's government by (or for the benefit of) corporations, business, the power
elite, with the remainder of the economic benefits trickled down to the
general society as needed to maintain stability of the socio-economic
structure... to keep the geese (the proles) laying those golden eggs.

If that's even an approximation of a definition, then someone needs to
explain to me how the U.S. *isn't* a fascist state, and further, why fascism
should be at all precluded in any way by a capitalist economic system.

Leigh

Maoist Internationalist Movement



2002 MIM Congress


"Definition of fascism"


 <http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/wim/cong/line1.gif>

Here MIM culls some of the defining characteristics of fascism from classic
texts of the Third International: Dimitrov's report to the 7th world
congress of the COMINTERN (1) and Dutt's "Fascism and Social Revolution."(2)
Applying these principles today, we can say that even though the
imperialists have not implemented fascist measures against the exploiter
majority in First World countries, the imperialists are the principal prop
of fascism in the oppressed nations. This is why MIM wages a concerted fight
against nationalist social-democracy and fascism in Europe. Both are strains
of militant parasitism; both support the status quo of oppression in the
Third World.

1. Fascism is "the open terroristic dictatorship of the most reactionary,
most chauvinistic, and most imperialist elements of finance
capital."(Dimitrov, p. 2)

2. Fascism is an extreme measure taken by the bourgeoisie to forestall
proletarian revolution; it "expresses the weakness of the bourgeoisie
itself, afraid of the realization of a united struggle of the working class,
afraid of revolution, and no longer in a position to maintain its
dictatorship over the masses by the old means of bourgeois democracy and
parliamentarianism."(Dimitrov, p. 2) "The conditions [which give rise to
fascism] are: instability of capitalist relationships; the existence of
considerable declassed social elements, the pauperization of broad strata of
the urban petit-bourgeoisie and of the intelligentsia; discontent among the
rural petit-bourgeoisie, and finally, the constant menace of mass
proletarian action."(Dutt, p. 88)

3. Fascism concentrates each imperialist bloc into a single economic unit
while at the same time increasing between-bloc antagonisms and advancing
towards war. (Dutt, pp. 72-73)

4. Fascism promotes chauvinist demagogy (e.g. reducing the problem of
parasitism to the "Jewish Question") and anti-science obscuratinism (e.g.
Dutt, pp. 54-58 or any Jerry Bruckheimer film). Fascism hypocritically
adopts Marxist critiques of capitalism, and bourgeois democracy.(Dimitrov,
pp. 6-7) It does this to "utilize the discontent of the petit-bourgeois, the
intellectual, and other strata in society."(Dutt, p. 89)

5. Still, fascism may not completely dispense with bourgeois democracy--e.g.
banning revolutionary parties or even competing bourgeois parties--depending
on "historical, social and economic conditions."(Dimitrov, p. 4)

6. Both bourgeois democracy and fascism are forms of the class dictatorship
of finance or comprador capital (in imperialist and semi-colonial countries,
respectively)--that is, both use organized violence to maintain the class
rule of the oppressors over the oppressed. Hence, any differentiation
between bourgeois democracy and fascism is a strategic or tactical
matter--not a matter of Marxist principles.

7. The difference between bourgeois democracy and fascism is a matter of
quantitative changes leading to a qualitative change. The qualitative
differences are relevant to us in terms of their effect on our policies
towards non-proletarian classes. "The accession to power of fascism is not
an ordinary succession of one bourgeois government by another, but a
substitution of one state form of class domination of the
bourgeoisie--bourgeois democracy--by another form--open terrorist
dictatorship. It would be a serious mistake to ignore this distinction, a
mistake liable to prevent the revolutionary proletariat from mobilizing the
widest strata of the working people of town and country for the struggle
against the menace of seizure of power by the fascists, and from taking
advantage of the contradictions which exist in the camp of the bourgeoisie
itself. But it is a mistake, no less serious and dangerous, to underrate the
importance of, for the establishment of fascist dictatorship, of the
reactionary measures of the bourgeoisie at present increasingly developing
in bourgeois-democratic countries--measures which suppress the democratic
liberties of the working people, falsify and curtail the rights of
parliament and intensify the repression of the revolutionary
movement."(Dimitrov, pp. 4-5; emphasis in the original)

8. Social democrats of the Second International ilk paved the way for the
fascists by closely identifying itself with the national interests of their
respective imperialists states, denying internationalism, placing their
faith in bourgeois democracy and scuttling the extra-legal struggle for
state power. Hence they earned the epithet "social fascists."

9. The COMINTERN United Front policy was based on its assessment that
"[f]ascism is the most viscious enemy of the working class and working
people, who constitute nine-tenths of the people in [the] fascist [and
proto-fascist] countries."(p. 12) Furthermore, the working class in these
countries constituted a unified proletariat. Fascism was eroding the
material basis for differences between communist and social-democratic
workers.(E.g. Dimitrov, pp. 24-34)

10. The labor aristocracy is majority in the imperialist countries and not
proletarian. The fact that the imperialist allow the labor aristocracy
bourgeois democracy is an example of the alliance between these two classes
and consistent with the following observation from Dutt: "Fascism strives to
establish political and organizational unity among all the governing classes
of capitalist society (the bankers, the big industrialists and the
agrarians), and to establish their undivided, open and consistent
dictatorship."(Dutt, p 89; emphasis added)

Notes:
1. George Dimitrov, Against Fascism and War, New York: International
Publishers, 1986.

2. R Palme Dutt, Fascism and Social Revolution, New York: International
Publishers, 1934.


*See also fascist founder Mussolini define "fascism" himself in the Italian
Encyclopedia of his day: note his inclusion of anti-communism as a key tenet
and his celebration of perpetual war and imperialism
<http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/mussolini-fascism.html>

http://www.etext.org/Politics/MIM/wim/cong/fascismdef.html

Reply via email to