Thanks to Rghu & Ravi for amplifying the the issue. 

Raghu:
"Pfft! 1700 signatories? Big deal. Compare with a 1.1 billion Indians and 
1000,000 people of Indian origin in the US (at least 50% of whom are online)."

REPLY:
Sure - agreed! 

Raghu:
"Also as Ravi points out the article is seriously dated. Joshi is no longer 
education minister and his party no longer rules India. Has the new
government reversed some of those awful textbook changes?"

REPLY:
1. Indeed ravi's addition was helpful. I was reminded of this article by the 
Communist workers party Pakistan e-list, & it just struck me as where the 
'real' enemies were (rather than in the sect next to us & trying to talk to us 
I mean). 

2. Yes there have been changes in India. I hesitate to use that emotive word 
that apparently some here feel should be banned, but the move towards fascism 
there is even more pervasive now, in my own view. What are we to make of the 
moves to curtail court justice in India vis-a-vis the case of Afzal (Go to: 
http://parisar.wordpress.com/)
I confess I do not have direct knowledge of the textbook issue.

3. Of course the matter of constitutional rights and constant denial of them in 
Indian 'justice', and my linking of them to a relationship to 'fascism' - 
should prompt the question - "Why do I make a distinction between here & there 
in this regard? (See my earlier note re fascism definitions etc).
After all my understanding of the Bush manoeuvres around the rights of 
Guantanamo bay prisoners etc, might be tarred with the same slogan. I think 
that there is more 'freedom' to withstand such assaults here than there is in 
India right now. I grant you - I may be on thin ice on this argument - but I 
think there is a separation. 

4. Finally - to another 'banned' word. that is the word 'conspiracy'. Reverting 
to the State led move to the hanging of Afzal Guru:
I quote from the Indian journal 'Revolutionary Democracy':
"Save Md. Afzal Guru From Being Hanged!
Two new articles have been added on the Afzal/ parliament attack case which
establish that the NDA government had intelligence reports suggesting that the
Indian parliament was about to be attacked:

Pranab Mukherji's Reply to Home Minister L. K. Advani's Statement in Parliament
on 18 December 2001
Manmohan Singh’s Reply to Home Minister L. K. Advani's Statement in Parliament
on 18 December 2001
See: http://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/  "


With Best Wishes,
Hari 

Reply via email to