according to one of the "experts" (Tony Blankley) from the Moonie Washington TIMES on a local NPR station, this story from the New York TIMES went against what the NYT has been saying for awhile. That is, it said that Saddam would have had Ws of MD in 2005 or 2006 if the US hadn't invaded. Any thoughts?
On 11/5/06, Mark Lause <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to NPR, it was information on building the triggering device for a nuclear weapon...exactly what the experts think Iran doesn't have. I'm sure that any subsequent surprising bangs will be the inspiration for Son-of-Patriot-Act. ML
-- Jim Devine / "Mathematics has given economics rigor, but alas, also mortis." -- Robert Heilbroner
