On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:

FWIW, from the "glass is always more than half empty" camp:

Alexandre Leroi-Ponant, "Iran's New Power Balance,"
<http://mondediplo.com/2006/12/04iran>.

in which we read:
Ahmadinejad undertook a far-reaching reorganisation of power in the state apparatus. The entire political and institutional hierarchy has been transformed and several thousand posts have changed hands: even university rectors and deans were pensioned off if they were considered close to the reformists. Ahmadinejad, knowing that he was shunned by the non-ideological fringes of the government, attacked the technocracy. This autumn he dissolved the national planning organisation that allocated the budgets for the ministries, and transferred this role to the prefectures. These come under the authority of the interior ministry, a conservative stronghold.

During Khatami’s presidency, the ministry of Islamic guidance, which supervised the output of the media and the intellectuals, had been transformed into a cultural organisation. Publications dealing with art and culture, Iranian society, and the opening-up of politics, proliferated. Many new papers and magazines were authorised. But the conservatives used the judicial apparatus as a counterweight to crack down on dissident intellectuals and the ministry reverted to its repressive role after Ahmadinejad was elected.

Ahmadinejad handed out huge sums of money, in US dollar contracts, to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the Pasdaran (see “The Pasdaran’s private empires”), which had supported him. Money for the construction of a gas pipeline was granted to Khatam-ol-Anbiya, a Pasdaran company. The Pasdaran has become an economic giant, authorised to import goods for sale on the domestic market without paying duties. It has also become a major player in the oil sector. State largesse, which extends to a segment of its clientele, combined with a policy that is a licence to print money, has contributed to the inflation that has raised the price of necessities and further eroded the spending power of the poor. This has disillusioned a large segment of the poor as well as the urban lower-middle classes with limited resources who were depending on Ahmadinejad to improve their living conditions.

I'll forego comment in the interests of PEN-L peace.

Reply via email to