On 7/1/07, Doyle Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a wow response. Wow meaning to me a beautiful and in depth flow.
thanks.
I think though, that the breakdown of the concept in science doesn't really deal with the support for this process.
I don't understand. For example,
pesticides have come back with this idea DDT saved lives from malaria, and when it was banned the environmentalist killed millions. So the 'argument' of logic is widespread of cause and effect that still has great popular support in how knowledge in public information is generated.
huh? -- Jim Devine / "Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way and let people talk.) -- Karl, paraphrasing Dante.
