On Sep 3, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Eugene Coyle wrote:

The FED and its constituency, no more able to think outside its
preconceptions than we are, blamed inflation on workers demanding
too much, hence the mantra was "Let's throw another million out of
work."

Well, yeah. This is straight out of Kalecki, too: if the unemployment
rate gets too low, the balance of power will shift toward labor and
away from capital. The Fed (why the caps? it's not an acronym) can
think in clear class struggle terms, even if "progressive economists"
can't.

  They believed in the aggregate U-shaped cost curve, despite all
evidence that the aggregate cost curve was flat -- flat until some
as yet un-experienced level.  As an aside, I think Henwood has
internalized that belief which is why he always jumps into the fray
on PEN=L at the appropriate moment, pointing out that that the
national capacity utilization rate had reached some astonishingly
high level of, say, 81.6 percent, or worse, 82.6 percent.

Let's take it up to 105%!

Not sure what your point is here, though I'm sure you have one.

Doug

Reply via email to