December 12, 2007 / New York TIMES.

DNA Pioneer's Genome Blurs Race Lines
By JOHN SCHWARTZ

Now, this is awkward.

James D. Watson, the co-discoverer of the structure of DNA and winner
of the Nobel prize, raised a storm recently when a British newspaper
quoted him saying that black Africans are not as intelligent as
whites. But his own brilliant DNA seems to blur the lines.

A new analysis of Dr. Watson's genome shows that he has 16 times the
number of genes considered to be of African origin than the average
white European does — about the same amount of African DNA that would
show up if one great-grandparent were African, said Kari Stefansson,
the chief executive of deCODE Genetics of Iceland, which did the
analysis.

"This came up as a bit of a surprise," Dr. Stefansson said in an
interview, "especially as a sequel to his utterly inappropriate
comments about Africans."

After the news of Dr. Watson's genetic ancestry was published in The
Times of London on Sunday, much of the British media played the news
for a lark, with headlines like "Revealed: Scientist Who Sparked
Racism Row Has Black Genes" and "DNA Pioneer James Watson Is Blacker
Than He Thought."

But the news, straddling the uncertain boundary of genetic science and
society, is more than a Southern gothic drama of racial identity
played out on the world stage.

"The irony is bigger, and broader, than his having made derogatory
comments and having an ancestral relationship with the folks he
insulted," said Kathy Hudson, the founder and director of the Genetics
and Public Policy Center in Washington. As people see what happens to
Dr. Watson and others as they undergo what she called the "molecular
Full Monty," the inevitable surprises might "help people make the
decision about whether they want their information for themselves, and
to ask, Who will I share this with?"

more at: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/12/science/12watson.html
-- 
Jim Devine / "The conventional view serves to protect us from the
painful job of thinking." -- John Kenneth Galbraith

Reply via email to