<http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=13903&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=>Peter
Power's probability, 'a spooky coincidence'
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=172259#172259
Working this figure out shouldn't be difficult but it has appeared to
be. Perhaps the waters have been being deliberately muddied in the
bigger 'game theory' scheme of things?
Indeed the 'New World Order' perpetrators and their chums see
controlling the historical record as a game where anyone telling the
truth can be 'gamed out of existence' by everything from dimwits to
psychological warfare officers both civilian (Strategic Communication
Labs) and military (Brigade 7/7).
So lets start from the basics again.
Rolling a six with a die gets exponentially less likely the more
times you roll it. You work out the probability of getting a specific
number on a die multiple times using 'powers'. That is a little
number 2, 3 etc just after the number and above it. The chance of
rolling a six twice is not 6 x 2 = 12 to 1, but 6 x 6, or 6 to the
power of 2, thats 36 to 1.
Ie 6 to the power of two or three etc. depending on how many times
you roll the die will give you the probability of getting a six every
time, depending on how many times you roll it.
Now lets imagine a tube station die with 275 different sides, one for
every tube station in London.
You don't work out the probability of rolling a specific number on a
275 sided dice three times by multiplying 275 by three giving 825 to
1. No. It's 275 to the power of three, which is 275 x 275 x 275.
Which equals roughly 20,800,000 to 1.
That's just the tube stations.
Then we have the days of the year on top of that for the exercise and
the bomb attack to coincide.
That's a simple 365 to 1 chance - multiplied in.
Which brings us up to about 6.6 billion to one.
Yes, there will be other considerations such as drills at weekends
and lonely tube stations nobody wants to bomb, but that six billion
to one probability igure is the baseline on which the case for the
prosecution of Peter Power rests.
6.6 billion to one
Spooky indeed....
In all this minutiae its easy to lose the bigger picture that Peter
Power via the BBC's Mike Rudin, a somewhat tarnished path, has told
us his spooky drill was commissioned by Reed Elsevier. The Dutch firm
which describes itself as 'multinational based in London', were also
the organisers, until 2007, 2 years after the 7/7 London bombings, of
the world's biggest arms fair. London's annual DSEI, ExCel Arms Fair,
And by the way if anyone has a video copy of the Canadian CBC TV 7
July 2005 broadcast where Power mentions the 'spooky coincidence'
please do share it with us all as that specific clip seems to have
entirely disappeared off the internet.
Spooky......
My audio only copy is here....
Reed Elsevier 7/7 drills: 'spooky coincidence' Peter Power Visor
Consultants on CBC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqOba9et0lY
From the Peter Power spotted thread
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=95341#95341
Some discussion on statistics of Peter Power's 'Spooky Coincidence'
Any scientists in the house please weigh in
TonyGosling
I have revised this figure because it appears that Peter Power makes
no claims about the bus bombing.
it's actually quite a bit less but still a lot, a lot, a lot.
275 x 275 x 275 x 365 = 7,600 million to one.
TonyGosling
With 275 stations, three bombs, 2013 bus stops and 365 days in the
year I calculate a probability of one in a little over fifteen
million million that Peter Power is telling the truth.
That is
One in 15,000,000,000,000 or
One in 1.5 x 10 to the power of thirteen
How disturbing it would be to bump into Peter Power on the London
Underground. I'm not sure he sould be approached.[/quote][/quote]
Tom Secker
Different calculations and resultant probabilities have been
proffered by others involved with the 7/7 case. Journalist Tony
Gosling has offered two different numbers: 6 billion to one, and 7.6
billion to one.
During a PressTV debate on 7/7, self-styled conspiracy debunker David
Aaronovitch challenged Gosling over his claim of probability. Gosling
replied, 'I sat and worked it out. 275 tube stations times three
multiplied by 365 days of the year.'
Unfortunately for Gosling, even if this were an appropriate method to
calculate probability, it doesn't produce anything close to 6 billion
to one odds. 275 x 3 x 365 = 301,125. Gosling was also making the
assumption that every station is an equally likely target, and that
every day is equally likely to see an attack. He also assumed,
incorrectly, that there is at most one attack and one exercise per year.
p. 253- Secrets, Spies and 7/7
http://www.investigatingtheterror.com/SS7-7/Secrets-Spies-and-77.pdf
Zimboy
There is a 7,600 million to one chance that he is telling the truth
about his exercise having no link to the attack
ian neal
Nonsense. Showing your lack of understanding of statistics helps no one
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
