On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 07:38:49PM -0400, Casey West wrote: > Here goes... > > After recieving more opinions that I can manage to hold in my light > weight frame, I am pretty much convinced with this line of thinking: > > All new works encorporated into the Perl Documentation Project are > required to choose one, or some combination of, the following > licenses for their work: OPL, GNU FDL. Your choice of license may > be changed for future versions of your work. Your choice of license > will determine the ways in which your work may be distributed by the > Perl Documentation Project on your behalf.
Unless the Perl Documentation Project is entirely standalone, written from scratch, I'd say that anything that isn't dually licensed AL/GPL (that is, "under the same terms as Perl") is out of the question. Anything that comes in the tarball should be dually licensed. Derived works could technically be AL or GPL only (as you have the option to accept just one of the licenses), but don't count on contributions from me if it is. Abigail
