Rich Bowen writes: > It's always been my understanding that the presence of something in > the FAQ says implicitly that something is lacking in the > documentation.
Not necessarily--people don't always read the documentation. By all means, though, feel free to improve the standard docs. You can even steal from the FAQ if you need text to fill a gap. As the documentation list is the place for FAQ patches, there's not much barrier to saying "hey, this belongs in perlref too". Thanks for making us explicitly aware to watch for that, though. Nat
