Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness?

[Simon Cozens]

On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 09:46:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why is t/TEST anything more than a thin wrapper around Test::Harness?

Because of potential fragility. If Perl isn't entirely together when
you're running the tests, the last thing you want to do is load up
Test::Harness. t/TEST is (supposedly) crafted in such a way that it avoids
using things that are likely to be broken.

-- 
The complex-type shall be a simple-type.  ISO 10206:1991 (Extended Pascal)