On Sun, Feb 18, 2001 at 06:14:05PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: > > Would anyone scream if I gave a shot at gutting TEST? > > Please make sure 'make minitest' works. Check. I'd forgotten about it. > And also think about what happens if 'use' is broken :-). Bad things, Mikey. Bad things. Since TEST does pretty much everything I need now, I'm going to not poke this at the moment. -- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
- Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? schwern
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? schwern
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? schwern
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Simon Cozens
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? schwern
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? nick
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? schwern
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? schwern
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Andreas J. Koenig
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why t/TEST and not Test::Harness? Philip Newton