[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you've got a machine with some spare CPU ticks, and RC5 has gotten > old, step forward. The weirder the setup the better. Why is perl-qa not sufficient for this? -- John Porter
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... schwern
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... H . Merijn Brand
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Jonathan Atzger
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Jonathan Atzger
- RE: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Fabio
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Vadim Konovalov
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Uri Guttman
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... abigail
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Bart Lateur
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... John Porter
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... David Grove
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... Elaine -HFB- Ashton
- Re: ANNOUNCE: [email protected] Discussion of perl's d... schwern
