Re: ANNOUNCE: smokers@perl.org Discussion of perl's daily build and smoke test

[schwern]

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 09:09:29PM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If you've got a machine with some spare CPU ticks, and RC5 has gotten
> > old, step forward.  The weirder the setup the better.
> 
> Why is perl-qa not sufficient for this?

Just trying to keep things organized.  I'm also trying to keep the
volume of mail down on both perl-qa and what must be read by a smoker
(guess THAT one didn't work).  Alot of people said along the lines of
"I have a spare machine, but not alot of time..."

-- 
Michael G Schwern   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>       Kwalitee Is Job One