-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Moin,
On 15-Dec-01 Jarkko Hietaniemi tried to scribble about: >> Ok, so that's a bit off the topic of "why use isa_ok()" but I just don't >> see why people seem to object to the use of Test::More in the core Perl >> tests. I can't see how it couldn't help improve the quality of the >> tests >> while providing a standardized way to do the things that all the tests >> do >> anyway. > > Mainly it's a question of bootstrapping. Test::More is quite fancy > and unless all the Perl it needs is working, you are not testing > what you think you are testing. Requiring poetry before you know > how to spell is unfair. Try meditating on the word "core". But it should be okay for additional modules, like Math::BigInt. One day I need to switch to Test::More, since the "add debugging print statements" get's on my nerves. Cheers, Te"One day Math::Big* will have more tests than Perl;)"ls - -- perl -MDev::Bollocks -e'print Dev::Bollocks->rand(),"\n"' confidentially innovate market-driven customers http://bloodgate.com/perl My current Perl projects PGP key available on http://bloodgate.com/tels.asc or via email -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 iQEVAwUBPBvTNncLPEOTuEwVAQGW0wf7BafFa25z0gTcGQ89DRh140yevRcuxmFg 4x43kdy9NiBtal7k2RMrkkyglhTJCd6ytIihE0Bsg6/tufjm5nHRyHqT+Anx1L+9 0BX7tPzfcTJ68oPV24enczbtLv3hsjcCDipMPrz/gcE/Ua6I2Q/kitagxV44hh4p Tl8sDVHeuHNskkooOAPobo99URwjBdGckfiMn1Q9kSg8T7wuyUG8+bvdkshM0w5v tQMt8pwarzmHhR+dzrSOxIaEfhr28ldC/anWbhPsH9rzjsty7cjnIzLm/LRDLH8s moirvu4UFFj5aToqHqSiEwtQyKzYfbX3TIUQkeKz5yL/qKGibpoT1g== =TeV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
