Michael G Schwern wrote:
>> An alternative is to drop the ugly ok2() and force the test writer to
>> use:
>>
>> ok(1 == 2, "");
>>
>> I prefer that since I want to make it hard for people to avoid giving
>> a test a name, er, comment.
>
> At the very least some better name than ok2().
Name suggestions gratefully received. I wanted something short, to make
it easier than "ok(1 == 1, "");", and ok2() fits in with the historical
naming of functions like wait(), wait2(), wait3(), wait4(), and so on.
N
--
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
-- The 75 column-ometer
Not speaking on behalf of my employer. </bush>
