On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:52:00 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than do any additional exploding, I'd like to propose the > additional kwalitee test "has_changes". I've noticed that a percentage > (5-10%) of dists don't have a changes file, so it can be hard to know grep { m/^chang(es?|log)|history$/i && -s $_ }, <* */* >; # Like that ? > whether it's worth upgrading, or more importantly which version to add > dependencies for. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using Perl 5.6.2, 5.8.0, 5.8.5, & 5.9.2 on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00 & 11.11, AIX 4.3 & 5.2, SuSE 9.2 & 9.3, and Cygwin. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn Smoking perl: http://www.test-smoke.org, perl QA: http://qa.perl.org reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], perl-qa@perl.org