Christopher H. Laco wrote: > I'm in the same boat. Recently, I've started testing my environment when > things go wrong. (I blame Andy). I have one test alone that has a test > count of 500,000+. That's a lot of oks to be processed, when I only want > the ones that didn't pass. > > Now, add in a few more tests that easily go into the 50,000 range in > addition to 'the bi one', and waiting for the test output/TAP to be > parsed takes quite a while. > > Just my $0.02 worth.
I am totally unconvinced. I would love to see some profiling on this. I would hope that the act of running 50,000 tests would swamp the cost of parsing 50,000 tests.