Re: Paying for TAP 2.0

[Paul Beckingham]

I'm wanting sparse output:

        1..100 sparse
        12 not ok
        83 not ok
Which is three lines of output, instead of 97, but contains the same  
information as:

        1..100
        1 ok
        2 ok
        ...
        12 not ok
        ...
        83 not ok
        84 ok
        ...
        100 ok

The essence of this is that with the plan of "1..100 sparse", missing  
"ok N" lines are assumed to exist, if they are not specifically output.

Because I need to retain the output of all tests, and those files get  
large, but mostly because of the sheer redundancy.