* Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-20 00:50]:
> Let's just forget that it was called "YAML-ish", and just think
> "key/ value pairs".

Works for me if you define a grammar. Though the JSON suggestion
is also good and if people agree to do it, I’d be in favour.
Certainly it would help implementors from other languages; YAML
has some coverage among dynamic languages, but it can’t match
JSON and probably never will. (Not the full format anyway.)

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to