On 26 Oct 2007, at 17:36, Jonathan Swartz wrote:
Would it be easier to write a subclass of TAP::Harness and use runtests, instead of Test::Harness and prove? I confess that I'm still a little confused about the relationship between the two going forward.
Test::Harness exists only as a compatibility layer. New applications should use TAP::Harness (and prove uses TAP::Harness too)
