On Monday 19 November 2007 14:11:35 Andy Lester wrote: > I guess I'm not seeing why a deferred plan is better than no plan at > all. Seems to me the whole point of a plan is that you know up front > how many they're gonna be.
There's that, and there's that Ovid's tests take too long to run when you time all of the startup costs. I'm having trouble convincing myself that the right solution to that is to wedge more stuff into TAP though. -- c
