On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:29 +0100, Abe Timmerman wrote: > App::Prove can only do a simple version of rules (that ends up running the > tests all wrong). > > On the other hand, prove has all the logic we need to get the job done. > > Is there a way, without redoing all the work in App::Prove to get this done?
This seems to have gotten Warnock'd. There's no way to do this currently without writing code, but it seems like a prefectly reasonable thing to want to do. I _think_ the right answer is to extend the --rules option to prove, but I'm not convinced. Thoughts? - Alex -- Networking -- only one letter away from not working
