Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I've not looked at what the >Encode regression tests actually do, so I don't know how thoroughly they >check whether the transformations are actually correct. In other words, >done correctly this approach *will* generate the same transformation tables >as before, and although I *think* I'm doing it correctly (without the -O; >patches welcome) I'm not certain of this.
Someone could/should write a generic test that pushes all codepoints supported by a .ucm file both ways through the generated encoder and checks for correctness. This would be a pointless thing to do as part of perl's "make test" as once the "compiler" works it works, but would be useful for folk working on the compile process. -- Nick Ing-Simmons http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
