Hi, > Is there any reason HEM cannot be used in conjunction with the old event > model?
Not that I can think of. I just forgot to add it to that bit. My hooks arent real Win32 hooks at all, as you know, and I put the processing of them after the NEM stuff so as to make it more difficult to screw up normal functionality. If you want to handle something already handled by NEM, I recommend you use NEM. If you must use "HEM" then things will probably still work as expected, since it's likely you will override changes made by the NEM handlers. Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glenn Linderman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Aldo Calpini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <perl-win32-gui-hackers@lists.sourceforge.net>; "Stephen Pick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 4:42 PM Subject: Re: [perl-win32-gui-hackers] Proposition for NEM > On approximately 12/5/2003 7:00 AM, came the following characters from > the keyboard of Aldo Calpini: > > > Stephen Pick wrote: > > > >>Does typing "$win->Hook(132,\&hello)" class as an "*explicit* request"? > >>:) > > > > > > Steve, you have good points. I agree wholeheartedly with you, so what > > more can I say? go for it :-) > > > > just a quick note: the NEM, in its present state, is not really > > useable. I have different plans for the future (I already coded > > something in my codebase, but as I said it's not fully functional > > yet); that said, just be prepared for something completely different > > once I've ironed out all the design stuff and I will disclose my > > new codebase (which will probably be Win32::GUI 1.00 (at least! :-)). > > > > if I find the time, I would like to write a (very) technical article > > about all this Event Model stuff on Win32::GUI, so that you can see > > where we are (supposedly) going. keep on working on the current > > release (.665-Fix) for now, and we'll sort out how to re-integrate > > all the good things in the upcoming 1.00. > > All this sounds good. I was a little surprised your hooks are done > after regular Win32::GUI processing, but I guess they are still done > before/instead of DefWindowProc, so that makes sense to me. > > Is there any reason HEM cannot be used in conjunction with the old event > model? > > -- > Glenn -- http://nevcal.com/ > =========================== > Like almost everyone, I receive a lot of spam every day, much of it > offering to help me get out of debt or get rich quick. It's ridiculous. > -- Bill Gates > > And here is why it is ridiculous: > The division that includes Windows posted an operating profit of $2.26 > billion on revenue of $2.81 billion. > --from Reuters via > http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/031113/tech_microsoft_msn_1.html > > So that's profit of over 400% of investment... with a bit more > investment in Windows technology, particularly in the area of > reliability, the profit percentage might go down, but so might the bugs > and security problems? Seems like it would be a reasonable tradeoff. > WalMart earnings are 3.4% of investment. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > _______________________________________________ > Perl-Win32-GUI-Hackers mailing list > Perl-Win32-GUI-Hackers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perl-win32-gui-hackers >
