On approximately 12/5/2003 10:19 AM, came the following characters from
the keyboard of Steve Pick:
Hi,
Is there any reason HEM cannot be used in conjunction with the old event
model?
Not that I can think of. I just forgot to add it to that bit.
I'd find it more likely useful to me in the short term, if it were added
to the old event model ("OEM" ??? Horrible acronym, but we need something).
My hooks arent
real Win32 hooks at all, as you know, and I put the processing of them after
the NEM stuff so as to make it more difficult to screw up normal
functionality. If you want to handle something already handled by NEM, I
recommend you use NEM. If you must use "HEM" then things will probably still
work as expected, since it's likely you will override changes made by the
NEM handlers.
Yes, this makes more sense the longer I think about it, and the more you
explain it! Thanks.
--
Glenn -- http://nevcal.com/
===========================
Like almost everyone, I receive a lot of spam every day, much of it
offering to help me get out of debt or get rich quick. It's ridiculous.
-- Bill Gates
And here is why it is ridiculous:
The division that includes Windows posted an operating profit of $2.26
billion on revenue of $2.81 billion.
--from Reuters via
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/031113/tech_microsoft_msn_1.html
So that's profit of over 400% of investment... with a bit more
investment in Windows technology, particularly in the area of
reliability, the profit percentage might go down, but so might the bugs
and security problems? Seems like it would be a reasonable tradeoff.
WalMart earnings are 3.4% of investment.
