----- Mike Rylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think, because of the number and size of the changes involved, it > would be good to stamp the next version of MARC::Record as 2.0.0. > There's a good bit of stuff that hasn't been very widely tested, > though I know Evergreen and Koha use it on a daily basis, and a x.0.0 > version number implies newness. > > It doesn't seem too off the mark (heh...) anyway, since the name > MARC::Record2 (and variants) has been bandied about quietly in the > past. > > Thoughts/comments/sharp-sticks-in-the-eye? I completely agree. Even though M::R is working well in production environments there are definitely some kinks to work out. Implying newness is probably a good thing until we have time to properly identify and fix those kinks as well as do more testing, etc.
Kudos to you Mike for taking this on. Cheers, -- Joshua Ferraro SUPPORT FOR OPEN-SOURCE SOFTWARE President, Technology migration, training, maintenance, support LibLime Featuring Koha Open-Source ILS [EMAIL PROTECTED] |Full Demos at http://liblime.com/koha |1(888)KohaILS