Just a quick note: There is MARC::Fast[1] which should be named
Biblio::MARC because they share same API from end-user perspective.
However, it was written before Biblio::Isis, so it ended up in wrong
place.
I would prefer to have MooseX in name, because if I'm using Moose, I
don't really care about other MARC modules, and if I'm not, I'm not
interested in MARC module which requires it.
Just my $0.02 :-)
I wasn't aware of MARC::Fast... Biblio::Marc sounds good but if you plan
to use it, you have the precedence of course.
You're correct that a Moose based module could be an issue. Moose is not
a small dependence. It could be an overhead. It used to be. I don't
think it's the case anymore since Moose is so widespread today. There is
no performance penalty in any persistent environment and even in a CLI
program there is no perceptible difference.
--
Frédéric
