Karl Williamson wrote: > I did test the function on my machine by faking out the #ifdef's. But I > was using g++, where 'and' is a synonym for &&.
Same precedence? I'm curious. Are they copying Perl syntax? :-)
Karl Williamson wrote: > I did test the function on my machine by faking out the #ifdef's. But I > was using g++, where 'and' is a synonym for &&.
Same precedence? I'm curious. Are they copying Perl syntax? :-)