On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 03:16:51PM +0300, Stas Bekman wrote: > will it work w/o needing PERL_SET_CONTEXT(aTHX)?
If we just make the first arg a ptr to an interpreter, then we can leave it to the caller how they get hold of my_perl. > Most of the time we won't want perl_clone to do any cloning on it, since > every new interpreter will want to set an explicit new value. so I'd think > that perl_clone should always NULL it, no? in which case there is no need > for a function (besides the identifier to find the entry in the linked > list). In that case, your clone function can just set it to null. Other people's clone functions can do whatever they need. -- Britain, Britain, Britain! Discovered by Sir Henry Britain in sixteen-oh-ten. Sold to Germany a year later for a pfennig and the promise of a kiss. Destroyed in eighteen thirty-fourty two, and rebuilt a week later by a man. This we know. Hello. But what of the people of Britain? Who they? What do? And why? -- Little Britain
