In message <20000823054734$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Uri Guttman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what happens if you modify the hash when you have an iterator? also we > have to require the iteration order to be fixed for a given hash which > is not modified so slices and such will remain synchronized. Explaining how to deal with that was the main thrust of RFC136. Tom -- Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.compton.nu/ ...ERROR #1511: Brain Offline
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash iterato... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Jeremy Howard
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash ite... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash iterato... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 136 (v1) Implementation of hash iterators Uri Guttman
- Tom Hughes