>And that's offensive. What's offensive to one person is amusing to the next. >Please act like a grown-up. Stephen cast the >first stone, but that's no excuse for you to reply with a boulder. Sure it is: when a hoodlum jumps you with a knife, there's no reason to roll over and quietly submit to the death of a thousand cuts. No, you pull an Indy by responding with overwhelming firepower to dispatch the cretin forthwith before he gets cocky. Otherwise you're a willing victim with an FMH sign on his butt waiting for further abuse as the next bandit decides to chew on you. As nobody else said mum about that scat, I took care of it myself. >(hint: grown-ups would apologise at this point) I'm sorry he said that. --tom
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from core Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... John Porter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Stephen P. Potter
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Larry Wall
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions from c... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric functions fr... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Hildo Biersma
- Re: RFC 155 - Remove geometric function... Dan Sugalski