> Will "private" be a true scoping keyword? Or under strict would you have > to do this: > > private my %hash; It's not a replacement for C<my>, though C<use strict> *might* choose to overlook it. :-) Damian
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Kenneth Lee
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Kenneth Lee
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods David E. Wheeler
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Dave Rolsky
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and m... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys a... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and metho... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 188 (v1) Objects : Private keys and methods Damian Conway