Damian Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But I've gotta nitpick the name. I wonder if BLESS wouldn't be better? > > print calls PRINT, printf calls PRINTF, even if the subs don't do any > > printing. Sure makes it easier to see what's going on, to me at least. > > But BLESS doesn't do blessing. It does set-up. So it's called SETUP. :-) > > I'm certainly not averse to a better name -- INIT would be ideal, if it > weren't already spoken for -- but I think BLESS would be misleading. How about ONBLESS? Which admittedly suffers from not being a verb, but conveys the meaning rather well. I'm not entirely sure I *like* it, just tossing out another suggestion. -- Piers
- RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to initializ... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical c... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchic... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical c... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchic... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchic... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hiera... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hiera... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : H... Graham Barr
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : H... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchic... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hiera... John Siracusa
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls to ... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical calls... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 189 (v1) Objects : Hierarchical c... Matt Youell