On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 08:40:37AM -0700, Nathan Wiger wrote: > What if we added special XML/HTML-parsing ?< and ?> operators? What if we just provided deep enough hooks into the RE engine that specialized parsing constructs like these could easily be added by those who need them? -Scott -- Jonathan Scott Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Buddha Buck
- XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> operators? ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... David Corbin
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Richard Proctor
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Michael Maraist
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Tom Christiansen
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Bart Lateur
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... David L. Nicol
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?> ope... Richard Proctor