Mark-Jason Dominus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I also think it would be a step in the right direction if the WG chairs > wrote up summaries like they said they would. They obviously don't. > Frankly, I don't really see what the WG chairs are for, unless maybe > it's to play list mom. Good question. I've been feeling guilty about not doing much in the way of chair-like things with date-time, but I'm also not sure what exactly I'm supposed to be doing. Discussion has essentially died out completely, which means that I probably should be trying to kick-start it. I'll go give that a shot. I was going to summarize discussion at the point at which we'd arrived at any conclusions, however preliminary, but there really hasn't been enough traffic to do that. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Mark-Jason Dominus
- What good are WG chairs? Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: What good are WG chairs? Russ Allbery
- Re: What good are WG chairs? Nathan Wiger
- Seems to me that -- Mike Lacey
- Re: Seems to me that -- Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Imple... Adam Turoff
- Update: Wrapping up -data RFC... Jeremy Howard
- Re: Update: Wrapping up -data... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperating th... skud
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperating th... skud
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperati... Michael G Schwern