At 05:30 PM 9/11/00 -0400, Chaim Frenkel wrote: >Up until that point, it is wasted energy. At this point, without code >there is nothing locked down, no cost in changing. (Yes, even though >they are bits, changing software, changing architecture has major >costs.) Don't forget that changing architecture has costs, even without code backing it yet. There's still the mental costs of refiguring how it all fits together. (And it does all need to fit together--if the mental model's a kludged up hack, the implementation will be too) This isn't to argue against making changes and reworking things, mind. Just pointing out that all changes have a cost. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperating th... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Seperati... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - Sepe... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementations - ... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implementation... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... John Porter
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Mark-Jason Dominus
- What good are WG chairs? Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: What good are WG chairs? Russ Allbery
- Re: What good are WG chairs? Nathan Wiger
- Seems to me that -- Mike Lacey
- Re: Seems to me that -- Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Nathan Torkington
- Re: RFC - Prototype RFC Implement... Adam Turoff