Re: RFC 263 (v1) Add null() keyword and fundamental data type

[Glenn Linderman]

That's not much different than the cost of undef, so I fear it proves
nothing, universally.

Tom Christiansen wrote:

> >It only takes a few pages, and a few truth tables to explain NULL.
> >It should only take a few pages and a few examples, to explain the
> >difference between undef and null.
>
> Ah, so the cost of this is twice a few pages of explanation, plus truth
> tables and examples?  Are you mad?
>
> I can think of no better proof that this is the Wrong Thing than
> your very own words.  Thank you.
>
> ---tom

--
Glenn
=====
Even if you're on the right track,
you'll get run over if you just sit there.
                       -- Will Rogers



_____NetZero Free Internet Access and Email______
   http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html