2000-09-27-15:19:23 Simon Cozens: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 03:17:01PM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote: > > I'd cite ruby as an indication that it shouldn't have to inflict any > > performance hit > > *boggle*. That's classic. Ruby *is* a performance hit. How so? Seems to run straightforward comparable stuff a bit quicker than perl; doesn't seem to take any more effort to express a good many things. -Bennett
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl becomes an object. Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl becomes an obj... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl becomes an obj... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl becomes an... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl become... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl be... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl become... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Perl be... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Matt Youell
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Buddha Buck
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Bennett Todd
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 161 (v4) Everything in Pe... Bennett Todd