At 10:32 AM 9/29/00 -0700, Peter Buckingham wrote: >Dan Sugalski wrote: > > > > At 04:17 PM 9/28/00 -0400, John Porter wrote: > > > > I think, though, that the core interface should be procedural. > > > > > >I agree. We should not confuse OOD with OOP. > > > > Fair enough, and I was. > > > > I've no experience with UML, though. Got a pointer to a quick overview? > >Try Martin Fowler's UML Distilled, very good and short! Is it available electronically, or do I need to trot over to Quantum Books and drop some cash on it? (Man, they love me there...) If it's paper, got an ISBN? Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Should Have W... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core ... John Porter
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Peter Buckingham
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl C... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Pe... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components ... Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Compone... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended rea... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl recommended rea... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... John van V
- Re: RFC 125 (v2) Components in the Perl Core Shou... 'John Porter'